Tweet
Is there any true relationship between hat size and penis size?
Hat size is usually dependent on head size and whilst head size could contribute to penis size, it's widely accepted that the the guys with the biggest heads will often have the smallest penises (this does remind us of the mushroom, which also lives it's life in the dark, thriving on bullshit).
Some would say that hat size has more to do with ball size than penis size and I'm sure if The Flying Dutchmen passed seven bowling balls, instead of tennis balls, it would show in their hat (in fact it would probably show in their trousers too, but that's another discussion). Of course, the theory of "the more balls, the bigger the hat" is rendered impotent when we look at Robert Nelson and all the female members (jugglers excluded) of this community.
Would Robert's hat double if he gets a prosthesis? Is there a similar genital comparison to be made about hat capacity and female performers?
It seems some medium male members may muse on how their moderate male members might compare to the (maybe) mighty members of the other (maybe) mighty male members in this modern modem-motivated medium (now there's a mouthfull).
We have Willy, John, Thomas, Dick, Peter, Lance, et al. Isn't it enough that so many men are named after their genitalia without us having to factor penis size into our economic theories?
I wear a size 58 hat.
[ 06-26-2003: Message edited by: Prof Willie B ]</p>
Hat size is usually dependent on head size and whilst head size could contribute to penis size, it's widely accepted that the the guys with the biggest heads will often have the smallest penises (this does remind us of the mushroom, which also lives it's life in the dark, thriving on bullshit).
Some would say that hat size has more to do with ball size than penis size and I'm sure if The Flying Dutchmen passed seven bowling balls, instead of tennis balls, it would show in their hat (in fact it would probably show in their trousers too, but that's another discussion). Of course, the theory of "the more balls, the bigger the hat" is rendered impotent when we look at Robert Nelson and all the female members (jugglers excluded) of this community.
Would Robert's hat double if he gets a prosthesis? Is there a similar genital comparison to be made about hat capacity and female performers?
It seems some medium male members may muse on how their moderate male members might compare to the (maybe) mighty members of the other (maybe) mighty male members in this modern modem-motivated medium (now there's a mouthfull).
We have Willy, John, Thomas, Dick, Peter, Lance, et al. Isn't it enough that so many men are named after their genitalia without us having to factor penis size into our economic theories?
I wear a size 58 hat.
[ 06-26-2003: Message edited by: Prof Willie B ]</p>
Comment