Fellow followers (of this thread),
I concur with David. Whether or not someone drives the bus, this will (and should be) a collaborative effort. After all, how much can one person know on any subject?
I do have a slight advantage over the rest of you in the fact that I can fly around to the different parts of the globe at reasonable fees in order to research the project (Kumi sez it’s OK as long as I don’t make any $ ...damn Japs and their ethics).
So where to begin? I have a call into Dubé already re: Patty’s European transcripts ... when he responds, I’ll let you all know what gives. Aside from that, it seems we should go back and reassess our history (not just the ‘70’s). This would seem to be a logical starting point. Again, I have to agree with Checker, subdivisions of the subject matter are necessary in order to clarify our perspective. Besides David’s suggestions does anyone else see any obvious choices?
One more thing, (and this comes from yet another post by Checker but on a different thread) ... “it’s all about relationship”. I learned that to be true (a long time ago) in any kind of storytelling and remain a strong proponent of the philosophy. So, my last question is: Who tells the story and who are we telling it to?
A word of caution (mostly to myself), back seat drivers don’t always see the road with the same eyes ... proceed slowly and use caution.
Are you on the bus, or off the bus?
Sorry, I always wanted to say that,
Robert
I concur with David. Whether or not someone drives the bus, this will (and should be) a collaborative effort. After all, how much can one person know on any subject?
I do have a slight advantage over the rest of you in the fact that I can fly around to the different parts of the globe at reasonable fees in order to research the project (Kumi sez it’s OK as long as I don’t make any $ ...damn Japs and their ethics).
So where to begin? I have a call into Dubé already re: Patty’s European transcripts ... when he responds, I’ll let you all know what gives. Aside from that, it seems we should go back and reassess our history (not just the ‘70’s). This would seem to be a logical starting point. Again, I have to agree with Checker, subdivisions of the subject matter are necessary in order to clarify our perspective. Besides David’s suggestions does anyone else see any obvious choices?
One more thing, (and this comes from yet another post by Checker but on a different thread) ... “it’s all about relationship”. I learned that to be true (a long time ago) in any kind of storytelling and remain a strong proponent of the philosophy. So, my last question is: Who tells the story and who are we telling it to?
A word of caution (mostly to myself), back seat drivers don’t always see the road with the same eyes ... proceed slowly and use caution.
Are you on the bus, or off the bus?
Sorry, I always wanted to say that,
Robert


Comment